Israeli Left should take responsibility for Oslo War
Ari Shavit (Ha'aretz)
February 22, 2001
The security situation that Ehud Barak's peace government has bequeathed to
Ariel Sharon's peace government can be more or less summed up in the
following manner: Hezbollah attacks on Har Dov (to which Israel refrains
from responding), Tanzim attacks on Har Gilo (to which Israel is incapable
of responding), a suicide attack at the Azur junction (to which Israel does
not know how to respond), shots fired at Israeli vehicles on the Modi'in
Highway, shots fired at Israeli vehicles on the Tunnel Road, and
approximately sixty Israelis and more than 300 Palestinians killed within
less than five months. This kind of security situation can only be described
as close to catastrophic. It would be unthinkable to imagine such a security
situation existing in any other self-respecting democracy.
This state of
affairs, which has not been experienced in this country since the mid-1950s,
can be directly attributed to the melt-down of two concepts: The Grand
Concept of Oslo and the Mini-Concept of the Withdrawal from Lebanon. In line
with the Grand Concept of Oslo, it was assumed that the flooding of the land
with fifty thousand AK-47 Kalashnikov assault rifles for the Palestinians
would usher in an era of peace for the Middle East. In line with the
Mini-Concept of the Withdrawal from Lebanon, it was assumed that the
deployment of Hezbollah rocket-launchers along the line on which Kibbutz
Menara is situated would usher in an era of peace for Israel's northern
frontier.
Both conceptions are the brain-child of the same genius. The records of the
Registrar of Patents documents in detail the fact that the Israeli who
invented the alchemist's formula of Oslo ("If we say that this is peace and
if we sing out loud that this is peace and if we keep on saying the
'Abracadabra' of peace then, perhaps, all this will truly lead to peace") is
the very same Israeli who thought up the lame-brain idea of the Israel
Defense Forces pulling out of Lebanon at any price ("If they defeat us,
chase us out and humiliate us, immediately afterwards they will certainly
leave us alone in peace").
However, this famed inventor cannot be held solely responsible for these two
concepts. Granted, the outgoing justice minister did turn Israel into a
country that is incapable of granting even a modicum of personal safety to
its own citizens, and has gambled twice on Israel's fate and has twice lost.
Granted, he still refuses to acknowledge that all his efforts have had
disastrous consequences and that his mistakes have been paid for in blood
and have produced hundreds of graves. But responsibility must also be shared
by thousands of other Israelis - intelligent individuals occupying key
positions in Israeli society - who were his partners in the scandal of these
two concepts. Thousands of Israelis who are the champions of and determined
crusaders for peace, are unable to muster the courage to stand up and
publicly declare that they have led Israel into this situation, that they
have brought Israel to the very brink of an abyss.
When prime minister Golda Meir, defense minister Moshe Dayan and the members
of the elite group who surrounded them led Israel into the fire of the Yom
Kippur War of 1973, they were called to account. When prime minister
Menachem Begin, defense minister Ariel Sharon and the members of the elite
group who surrounded them led Israel into another fire, the War in Lebanon
in 1982, they were called to account. When prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert unnecessarily placed Israel on a bed of
nails in 1996 over the Western Wall Tunnel, many Israelis demanded that they
be called to account. However, today, when it is crystal-clear that the
Oslo-Lebanon elite has led Israel into a true conflagration, has led Israel
to face a wall of fire that has already scorched acres and acres of land, no
one is calling the members of that elite to account. One Israeli after
another has been killed and yet no one is demanding that this elite group be
called to account. One Palestinian after another has been killed and yet no
one is demanding that this elite group be called to account. Granted, the
government has fallen, but none of its leading lights has been toppled. None
of them is seen to have made any error, none of them has blundered, none of
them bears any responsibility for the present situation.
The refusal by an entire stratum of leadership to assume responsibility for
its actions is an ugly and extremely grave phenomenon. Nonetheless, what is
needed now is not the collective deposing of all the members of the Oslo
group. Nor should the elite that was responsible for the serious blunder of
the two concepts, and which ruled this country with such arrogance for the
past seven years, be thrown out into the cold. The political culture of
public commissions of inquiry and public beheadings has run out of steam.
The political culture of mutual mud-slinging and mutual exclusion has
demonstrated its limits. Thus, a different kind of punishment must be meted
out to those responsible for the serious blunder of the two concepts. A
reverse form of punishment is what is called for. They must acknowledge that
they have made a tragic mistake and they must be forced to remain where they
are, to face the music, to assume responsibility. They must be full-fledged
partners in a national rescue project aimed at pulling Israel out of the two
minefields into which they have led it.
All this means that today, when Sharon is extending his hand in peace on the
domestic front, the Israeli left does not have the moral option of staying
on the sidelines. If Sharon's invitation is rejected and if, as a result, he
finds himself plunged into a war with the Palestinians, this armed
confrontation cannot be called Sharon's War. It will, instead, be the Oslo
War - the war that was built into the absurd framework that the Oslo elite
set up here. Similarly, if Sharon becomes entangled in a war on Israel's
northern frontier, this armed confrontation cannot be called Sharon's War.
It will be the Four Mothers' War - the war that was built into the
humiliating process in which four Israeli mothers forced the country to flee
from Lebanon. Thus, if war breaks out in the North, no leftist will be
entitled to stand in Tel Aviv's Yitzhak Rabin Square and protest. If war
breaks out in the North, no leftist will be entitled to sit and count the
dead beside the Official Residence of the prime minister in Jerusalem.
Because, this time around, those dead soldiers will belong to us. They will
belong to the Israeli left.
BACK TO GAMLA
|